- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Cuckfield Town F.C.
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cuckfield Town F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to pass WP:FOOTYN and the entire article is just sourced to the club website. There doesn't seem to be any significant coverage that would be required for WP:GNG. Spiderone 21:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Consider this a withdraw Spiderone 21:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Club fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: per others. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 21:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete - fails GNG and has not played at a significant level/in a significant competition. GiantSnowman 10:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:FOOTYN . The club played in Division Two of the Sussex County League, which today is Division One of the Southern Combination (level 10, although back in the early 1950s it would have been the equivalent of level five in the pyramid below the three tiers of the Football League, the one-tier Southern League and Division One of the Sussex County League). Pinging ArsenalFan700 and GiantSnowman for reconsidation. Number 57 17:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.