- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Craft of Charisma
- Craft of Charisma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails to meet the notability requirements for corporations / organizations - third party media coverage is sparse, and not in depth where it is found. JohnInDC (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree per above. Notability is not established and it comes across as advertisement (not neutral or NPOV). Yankeefan233 (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Also in favour of deleting, the article was written by an account that has been flagged as a single purpose account and with what appears to be a conflict of interest201.116.29.243 (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ORG. THF (talk) 06:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no significant coverage. [1]. suspect advertising. LibStar (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.