- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
British Airways Flight 34
- British Airways Flight 34 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
COMPLETELY NON-NOTABLE, DO BE SERIOUS!! What possible justification could there be for including this in an encyclopedia????????. At BEST a paragraph in the airport article or aircraft article!!!! Petebutt (talk) 11:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. While the nomination may be somewhat overzealous, there is nothing to distinguish this aircraft incident. No fatalities, no political impact, self-limited media coverage. Inclusion at List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft#2013 might not be unreasonable, but this falls well short of inclusion standards for its own article. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - whilst the aircraft was an insurance write off, the accident is already covered at the airline, airport and aircraft articles, which is sufficient. Would suggest the nominator tones down his reasons when nominating articles for deletion. A simple statement of reasons without shouting will be fine. Mjroots (talk) 18:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Squeamish Ossifrage. The incident caused no fatalities or any lasting effects, and the incident garnered only limited media coverage—certainly not enough to satisfy the guidelines at WP:NEVENTS. Mz7 (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete not notable for a stand-alone artice and already mentioned in other articles which is all that is needed. MilborneOne (talk) 09:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 10:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Squeamish Ossifrage and WP:OUTCOMES. We almost always delete crash articles where there are no fatalities, which are run of the mill, except in the rare case where the pilot did something extra to save lives. Bearian (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Squeamish Ossifrage - We don't have or need articles on every single plane incident in the world. –Davey2010 • (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.