- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shereth 21:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Best In Show Radio
- Best In Show Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Original deletion reason: article fails to assert why this internet radio station is notable. Lacks 3rd party verifiable references
Procedural nomination Gwernol 09:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Procedural nominations are not obligatory on contested PRODs. We have enough to do at AFD without having to consider them.--Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I never said they were. I am nominating this because I believe the original deletion reason has enough merit to warrant a debate here. Please address the issue of notability addresses in the deletion reason provided. Gwernol 22:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough, I couldn't tell at first whether you agreed with the PROD reason. Delete due to unclear claim to notability and insufficient evidence of independent reliable sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Non-notable and unverified.Yobmod (talk) 12:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of notability, no reliable sources. AndyJones (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.