- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Richard Valentine
- Anthony Richard Valentine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
appears to fail WP:NFOOTBALL Mayumashu (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL (as the CSL is not fully-professional), as well as WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 18:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Has not played in a fully pro league and has no significant coverage in reliable independent sources, failing WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 01:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Without fully pro appearances and significant coverage, he clearly fails all relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.