- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep. (Non-admin closure)Go Phightins! 23:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Amampondo
- Amampondo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BAND. Their sole claim to fame is a short blurb they once received in the National Geographic. Otherwise, this article has gone unsourced for six years. Time to let it go. Qworty (talk) 08:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep due to complete failure to follow WP:BEFORE. A quick Google search found this ("one of South Africa's leading ensembles"), this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this...Obviously notable. --Michig (talk) 18:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Here are a few more sources to go with the ones above [1][2][3][4]. Gongshow Talk 21:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.