- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 16:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are a 2 paragraph description in an interview with the directors, dead links, the production company (Films for Food is a subsidiary), and dead links. Not much else found in BEFORE. Icewhiz (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep has reliable sources coverage including ref 6 which I fixed which is not an interview and is significant coverage in a reliable source South African Times, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 04:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 04:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep, particularly on the basis it was championed by the South African government and also won a Best Film award. The sourcing is weak (the South African and SA Times articles are identical) but recognition in Africa and Europe fits my definition of general notability. Sionk (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: I'm not completely sold on the refs, but enough to not feel comfy about deletion either. Sorta a "ties go to the runner" deal. Nha Trang Allons! 19:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 09:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 09:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.