- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AQB Sports Ratings
- AQB Sports Ratings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to be notable. No hits in Google Scholar, one hit in Google Books that is not previewable, and no reliable sources turn up in a Google search. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sources simply do not exist. Nothing to demonstrate notability, and notability really isn't even claimed. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't meet notability guidelines. Harrias talk 19:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not a notable football rating system. GiantSnowman 14:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. —Warburton1368 (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of notability. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 06:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.