- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
7 Squadron SAAF
- 7 Squadron SAAF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Virtually no content, has not been added to since creation - suggest move to AfC or merge into SAAF Pesky (talk …stalk!) 05:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy Looks like somebody's sandbox from one 5-minute session, not an article. North8000 (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are lots of references on this squadron available through Google Books ([1]), and it's a safe bet that there are lots of offline sources on the unit. Nick-D (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sufficient data now added to qualify this article as a start class article. Farawayman (talk) 07:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - subject is notable under WP:GNG as it has received significant coverage in reliable sources. Anotherclown (talk) 11:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as notable as an operational second world war squadron. MilborneOne (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.