The best road to progress is freedom's road. - JFK
Florida
ROH Championship
Just to tell you, I reverted you because the title's real name was the ROH Title. ROH even state this on their website by splitting the title history by names.--WillC 03:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, would you like me to archive your talk page for you? It is entirely too long. Most pages should not be over 70,000 kilobytes but your's is over 442,500.--WillC 03:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I'm going by what the source says. It says ROH Title, therefor it should state ROH Title within the article.--WillC 04:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just don't cause any probelms please. I want to article to pass its FLC, and having problems now during the process will hurt in the long run. The ROH title web page is a clear reference while the dvds can't be checked out, people have to assume good faith. It would be best to follow the ROH site since at the moment there is nothing that needs to be sourced. Everything is either sourced by one of the two titles histories, with the ROH web site giving the list of defenses, champions, names, etc. While the past results sources all the title wins at events. So sourcing by the dvds will do nothing but if they are the dvds from each of the events, though not Super Card of Honor IV since I know you don't have that one since it hasn't been released, then you can use Cite Episode to help source the event results.--WillC 05:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you happen to know when The Prophecy (Christopher Daniels and Donovan Morgan) were given real championship belts after the ROH Tag Team Trophy was destroyed in September 2002? I'm working on the tag title in a subpage located here. I'm almost finished. Trying to fix the small things at the moment. This thing I do not know, and I can't seem to find anything about it.--WillC 09:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. This helps. Do you have any sources for those claims I can use?--WillC 10:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe, been a while since I read it, but according to WP:THE, all names that use the word "the" even a little, then "The" should be included in their name. Looking at Danielsosn's page, it says "the" American Dragon. Showing the name included the "The" even though it is not apart of the official name. It is to show proper nouns. As for the rest of the things, I'll fix them.--WillC 23:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delivered: 19:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ring Of Honor Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ring Of Honor Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use File:ROHPureChampionship.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ROHPureChampionship.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Levdr1lp / talk 18:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:ROHPureChampionship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).