Tech News: 2019-36
09:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
5 September 2019
Hi Mz7 - It looks like there's now a 'user removal' request. I am not familiar with Wikipedia procedures but I do think this is a bit exaggerated. I think I added valuable substance to the wiki on the Zitterbewegung - but ALL edits got deleted in a rather blanket way. I experience this as random. In any case, it doesn't matter all that much. But thanks that - somehow - you volunteered or got tasked with resolving this issue. In any case, I have not much interest in pursuing the discussion. I value Wikipedia but realize that technical discussions on complicated topics in quantum physics are perhaps not its forte. Kindest regards - Jean Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean Louis Van Belle (talk • contribs) 12:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Jean Louis Van Belle. Sorry for the delay in responding. It looks like someone thought that your user page was inappropriate and asked for it to be deleted; however, an administrator reviewed the deletion request and denied it, stating that the request was invalid. No one was trying to remove you as an editor; someone just thought your user page was inappropriate, which it isn't. Sorry for all that confusion—Wikipedia procedures can get unnecessarily complicated sometimes.
- Now, as far as my role in this goes, it appears that you received an automated message with a link to my username inside it. That message is a routine message sent by a robot to most new editors on Wikipedia. It is an invitation to The Teahouse, which is a question board that lets newcomers ask experienced editors how Wikipedia works. I used to help answer questions at the Teahouse often, but I haven't done so for quite some time. If you have any further questions about editing Wikipedia, I recommend giving the Teahouse a visit. Alternatively, you may continue asking me questions on my talk page here. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).
- Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
- Floquenbeam • Lectonar
- DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana
- Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
- The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2019 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello Mz7,
- Backlog
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
- Coordinator
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
- This month's refresher course
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
- Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
- Paid editing
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
- Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
- Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
- Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
- Tools
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
why you delete my page without my permission?
my page named Mr Dawar hase been deleted from live space just because of you as my deletion shows your name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westrextravels (talk • contribs) 13:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, Westrextravels. A Wikipedia editor nominated the article about Mr Dawar for deletion because they believed that Mr Dawar was not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. A group of editors reviewed the deletion proposal and agreed that the article should be deleted—you can read their comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Dawar. For this reason, I deleted the article. In order to understand why editors thought the article should be deleted, it is important to note that as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia cannot include an article about everyone. In order to determine the notability of a subject, Wikipedia editors look at the extent to which reliable sources have written about that subject. If reliable sources think that a subject is worth writing about, then it is generally safe to presume that the subject is indeed worth writing about in Wikipedia. In the case of Mr Dawar, the Wikipedia editors who participated in the deletion discussion agreed that not enough reliable sources existed which cover Mr Dawar significantly. It is also important to note that by submitting your article to Wikipedia, you irrevocably allow others to use, edit, and (in this case) delete the page at any time. This is why your permission was not required for me to delete the article—for more information about this, please see Wikipedia:Ownership of content. I hope this explanation is helpful to you. If you are confused or have any further questions, please feel free to let me know. Mz7 (talk) 09:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Tech News: 2019-40
16:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories
.
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
- As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
- The 2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place October 4th to 10th.
- The arbitration case regarding Fram was closed. While there will be a local RfC
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future
, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
- The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Lapras IP
May also want to tidy up this. GMGtalk 05:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: Done Mz7 (talk) 05:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-41
15:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Help w/locmapin
yo I'm trying to insert a map of Lombardy in a new draft, can someone help me with that, thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlavioDC00 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi FlavioDC00. Unfortunately, I'm not too knowledgeable about inserting maps into Wikipedia articles. I would try asking your question at the Wikipedia:Teahouse; someone there might know. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 00:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
My sincere apologies
...for misclicking on your account and accidentally blocking you. I was in the process of converting a block that you had made into a checkuser block. It took a few minutes for me to realize what had happened before I undid the block.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ah welp, there goes my clean block log. Mz7 (talk) 19:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Welcome to the Accidental Block Club! Your complimentary smoking jacket is in the mail...-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Excellent. I'm sure it'll look quite dapper. Mz7 (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Just wait until the monogrammed spats arrive! -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Excellent. I'm sure it'll look quite dapper. Mz7 (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Welcome to the Accidental Block Club! Your complimentary smoking jacket is in the mail...-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Bit late to the party, but welcome to the club! (mine). Speaking of which...still waiting on my jacket, Ponyo. Is this "smoking jacket" a new addition or just an enwiki thing? --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- If it's any consolation, and you're wondering where to go from here, my block log after 11 years of being clean is always worth a laugh. All I got was a squashed roll‑up. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Malaysian IP problem
Hi. I noticed you've run into the Malaysian IP vandal(s) 2001:d08::0/34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log). It's been reported at AN/ANI a number of times (most recently here) and I spent some time to come up with a more limited set of seven /40 ranges from which the vandalism originates (see here). The contributions are almost universally reverted, and what isn't reverted is questionable. If there's anything productive coming from the range, I doubt it outweighs the damage being done. I understand long-term IP range blocks are troublesome, but isn't this a candidate? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 00:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @AlanM1: I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Personally, I have not blocked a range this wide before, so I am uncomfortable doing it without first consulting other administrators. I noticed that you had previously brought this range up at AN/ANI—that may be a good venue to get more eyes on this. Mz7 (talk) 07:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Mz7: Thanks. I've made the case repeatedly, but other admins don't seem to want to engage either. The last one didn't even get a comment. Part of the problem may be that motives/actions of another plaintiff, Gundam5447, were questioned on his talk page (to AGF, possibly due to evidence of which I am unaware). Regardless of whatever might be going on there, this is a damaging persistent problem. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 20:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Happy Birthday to you!!!
Happy birthday
— Harshil want to talk? 06:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Happy birthday, Mz7!
Little birdie told me it was your birthday. Bit belated, but a happy birthday to you! . --TheSandDoctor Talk 07:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointments: Candidates appointed
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to welcome the following editors to the functionary team:
- L235 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as a CheckUser and Oversighter.
- Mz7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as a CheckUser and Oversighter.
- SQL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as a CheckUser.
- ST47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as a CheckUser and Oversighter.
- Stwalkerster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as an Oversighter.
- The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as an Oversighter.
- Xaosflux (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is appointed as an Oversighter.
The Committee thanks the community and all candidates for helping to bring this process to a successful conclusion.
The Committee also welcomes the following user back to the functionary team:
- Ivanvector (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who resigned his CheckUser permission in May 2019, is reappointed as a CheckUser following a request to the committee for return of the permission.
The Committee also thanks Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for his long history of contributions to the functionary team. Timotheus Canens voluntarily resigned his CheckUser and Oversight permissions in September 2019.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Katietalk 15:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointments: Candidates appointed
Tech News: 2019-42
23:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 06:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
——SerialNumber54129 06:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
i am going to make the Mr Dawar wikipedia page again
i am going to make the Mr Dawar wikipedia page again with sites refrence. Please if you read the negative suggess about delition kindly also check out positive ones the people just jelouse and nothing else they showoff with there instagram followers is this is include in your wikipedia policy to mention that a person should more followers on instagram then your editors have please do not delete this time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westrextravels (talk • contribs) 20:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Stellar checkuser service! I filed it, and twenty minutes later the mystery was solved. Thanks.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @ThatMontrealIP: Yeah, by chance I happened upon your request just as soon as you had posted it. Mz7 (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
You and SPI
I wish you would please stop writing such thoughtful comments at SPI, e.g., Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joohnny braavoo1. I'm so glad you were appointed a CU. Best.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-43
14:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
The Train Master Drafts
I think I accidentally recreated a draft in an edit conflict with you, see Draft:Saucon Rail Trail. Cards84664 (talk) 00:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Cards84664: Huh, that's interesting. I've never seen that happen before. Well, it's gone now. :) Mz7 (talk) 00:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-44
16:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Reply
Hello, Mz7. In response to the question you asked here, the material removed here was a copyvio of Sweezy's The Theory of Capitalist Development. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello Mz7,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 816 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
Orphaned non-free image File:Woolworths Stacked Tag RGB Positive HR.png
Thanks for uploading File:Woolworths Stacked Tag RGB Positive HR.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-45
16:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
2.29.209.7
Could you please block user:2.29.209.7. AIV is not responding, and she clearly does not intend to stop until she is blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Block evasion by Ramykhodeir
- Ramykhodeir (talk · contribs) appears to be back: [26]. Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ad Orientem took care of it. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding above SPI, the other socks are globally locked. I think these 3 should be as well. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Flix11. I've requested global locks at meta:Steward requests/Global: diff. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 10:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
For your kind comment. Must add here am rightly impressed with your contributions. Infinity11114444 (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-46
22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Request for a last chance
Can a last chance be given to me? I realized my mistake and understood that i misused my rights . Can u please give me a last chance .I promise that this will not happen anywhere and anytime in future except for the acts of vandalism.
Otherwise I think I should open a new account on Wikipedia and start all over again. King Rishab Dugar (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi King Rishab Dugar. You should not feel like you will never get rollback again unless you create a new account and start over (please see WP:SOCK for our policy on multiple accounts). I recommend spending the next few weeks reverting vandalism by patrolling Special:RecentChanges, making sure that you appropriately distinguish between vandalism and good faith edits in your edit summaries. If you edit from desktop, Twinkle is a fantastic tool that provides a sort of "rollback" button of its own, and it also makes warning vandals very easy as well. Once you have more experience reverting vandalism, feel free to re-request rollback either at WP:PERM or by asking me here on my talk page. Mz7 (talk) 07:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
help adding candidate page
see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/DGG
It isn;'t transcluding DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- @DGG: I took a look, and I think you've transcluded it properly. There is some technical magic on the page that organizes all of the candidate statements in random order every time you refresh the page, so make sure you aren't looking at the bottom of the candidate statements for yours! Mz7 (talk) 01:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Just want to acknowledge that I have seen your email. Apologies for the delay in responding. Mz7 (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-47
20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-48
16:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited