This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The table is inconsistent in describing emperors as 'dynastic' and 'non-dynastic'
Philip and his Philip II should be a dynasty, and the same applies to Gallus and Volusian. 2001:8003:2810:8A00:C979:3181:FAF5:B8BE (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rewrite, or substantial reworking, needed
The current article doesn't reflect modern scholarly works on the topic. Work really ought to be done on it by someone who is an expert in the topic. Whole sections are also muddled: the "history" section is largely unsourced, the causes section should really cite a good secondary source than the collection of websites that it currently does, the subsection on natural disasters therein seems to be a collection of news articles, etc. Ifly6 (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ifly6 I agree, so why not give it a try, you can't just wait for experts. Rjdeadly (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Roman empire after c. AD 14, maybe with some extension out to Claudius, is not my field. Someone who has an actual interest in the post-Severan period should contribute. I, frankly, find the whole Roman Empire historically tedious. Ifly6 (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]