This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:CSS General Earl Van Dorn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 00:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Images appropriately licensed
- Earwig 16%
- The conversion into warships for the River Defense Fleet vessels adding 1 inch (2.5 cm) of iron plating backed by 4 inches (10 cm) of oak planking Missing word?
- Link 32-pounder gun and tell readers that it was smoothbore muzzle loader
- Proximity alert for the ship's name in the first para of the Plumb Point Bend para. Mix up how you refer to the ship by using pronouns, etc.
- became ungrounded awkward
- Link salvaged
- Substitute barrier for blockade?
Mostly done. I'm still working on turning up a source that repeats the obvious claim that the 32-pounder was smoothbore and muzzle loading; everybody seems to view that as an understood fact. Hog Farm Talk 02:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)