This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia, including pages suspected to be copyright violations. Listings typically remain for at least five days before review and closure by a copyright problems clerk or administrator. During this time, interested contributors are invited to offer feedback about the problem at the relevant talk page, propose revisions to the material, or request copyright permission. After the listing period, a copyright problems clerk or administrator will review the listing and take further action if necessary.
Pages listed for copyright review appear in the bottom section of the page. The top includes information for people who have copyright concerns about pages or images, and for community volunteers who'd like to help resolve concerns.
To add a new listing, please go to . Instructions for dealing with copyright concerns can be found at Instructions for dealing with text-based copyright concerns.
Handling previously published text on Wikipedia
Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or claim copyright, for a copyright to exist.
Only one of the following allows works to be reused in Wikimedia projects:
A) Explicit Statement. An explicit statement (by the author, or by the holder of the rights to the work) that the material is either:
- in the public domain,
- licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA), or
- otherwise compatible with CC-BY-SA.
B) Public Domain. If the work is inherently in the public domain, due to its age, source or lack of originality; or
C) Fair Use. United States law allows for fair use of copyrighted content, and (within limits) Wikipedia does as well. Under guidelines for non-free content, brief selections of copyrighted text may be used, but only if clearly marked and with full attribution.
Even if a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, material should be properly attributed in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism in respect of local customs and attribution requirements of compatible licenses. If the terms of the compatible license are not met, use of the content can constitute a violation of copyright even if the license is compatible.
Repeated copyright violations
Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted text or images may be subject to contributor copyright investigations, to ensure the removal from the project of all copyright infringement. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing, to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512.
Backwards copying: when Wikipedia had (or may have had) it first
In some instances, it is clear that two pieces of text (one on Wikipedia, and one elsewhere) are copies of each other, but not clear which piece is the original and which is the copy. "Compliant" sites that copy Wikipedia text note that they have done so, but not all of our re-users are compliant.
If you've found such a case, you might first check the discussion page to see if a note has been added to the top of the talk page to allay people's concerns. If not, you can look for clues. Do other pages in the other website copy other Wikipedia articles? Did the content show up on Wikipedia all in one piece, placed by a single editor? If you don't see good evidence that Wikipedia had it first, it's a good idea to bring it up for investigation. You might follow the Instructions for listing below or tag the article {{copy-paste|url=possible source}}
so that others can evaluate.
If you confirm definitely that the content was on Wikipedia first, please consider adding {{backwardscopy}} to the article's talk page with an explanation of how you know. If you see an article somewhere else which was copied from Wikipedia without attribution, you might visit the CC-BY-SA compliance page or Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. There are well-documented cases of plagiarism from Wikipedia by external publications.
Instructions for dealing with text-based copyright concerns

Blatant infringement
Pages exhibiting blatant copyright infringements may be speedily deleted if:
- Content was copied from a source which does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, and was not copied from a mirror source.
- The page can neither be restored to a previous revision without infringing content, nor would the page be viable if the infringing content were removed.
- There is no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license.
To nominate an article for speedy deletion for copyright concerns, add one of these to the page:
{{db-copyvio|url=insert URL of source here}}
{{db-copyvio|describe non-web source here}}
Both of these templates will generate a notice that you should give the contributor of the content. This is important to help ensure that they do not continue to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to delete it or not. You should not blank the page in this instance.
Suspected or complicated infringement
If infringement is not blatant or the speedy deletion criteria do not apply:
- Remove or rewrite the infringing text avoiding copyright violations or revert the page to before the text was added.
- The infringing text will remain in the page history, and it may be tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Administrators hold discretion on the appropriateness of revision deletion for each case. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). Please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem, unless advised not to. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose.
- However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, reversion/removal is otherwise complicated, or the article is eligible for presumptive deletion:
- Replace the text with one of the following:
{{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}
{{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}
- Go to and add:
{{subst:article-cv|PageName}}
from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~
- to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you.) If there is not already a page for the day, as yours would be the first listing, please add a header to the top of the page using the page for another date as an example.
- Advise the contributor of the listing at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.
Instructions for special cases
- Probable copyvios without a known source: If you suspect that a page contains a copyright violation, but you cannot find a source for the violation (so you can't be sure that it's a violation), do not list it here. Instead, place {{cv-unsure|~~~|2=FULL_URL}} on the page's talk page, but replace FULL_URL with the full URL of the page version that you believe contains a violation. (To determine the URL, click on "Permanent link" in the toolbox area, and copy the URL.)
- One contributor has verifiably introduced copyright problems into multiple pages or files and assistance is needed in further review: See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.
Instructions for handling image copyright concerns
Image copyright concerns are not handled on this board. For images that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; otherwise list at Files for Discussion. To request assistance with contributors who have infringed copyright in multiple articles or files, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.
Responding to articles listed for copyright investigation
Any contributor is welcome to help investigate articles listed for copyright concerns, although only administrators, copyright problems board clerks, and VRT (formerly OTRS) agents should remove {{copyvio}} tags and mark listings resolved.
Assistance might include supplying evidence of non-infringement (or, conversely, of infringement) or obtaining and verifying permission of license. You might also help by rewriting problematic articles or removing infringing text (without removing {{copyvio}}).
Supplying evidence of non-infringement
Articles listed here are suspect of copyright concern, but not every article contains infringement. The content may be on Wikipedia first, in the public domain, compatibly licensed, or falls below threshold of originality for copyright. Sometimes, the person who placed it here is the copyright owner of freely-licensed material and this simply needs to be verified.
Information can be provided to prove compatible licensing or public domain status under the listing of the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article. A link or a clear explanation can be very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the matter. As listings are not immediately addressed on the board, it may take a few days after you make your note before a response is provided.
If the article is tagged for {{copyvio}}, you should allow an administrator or copyright problems clerk to remove the tag. If the article is tagged for {{copy-paste}} or {{close paraphrasing}}, you may remove the tag from the article when the problem is addressed (or disproven), but please do not close the listing on the copyright problems board itself.
Obtaining/verifying permission
Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. Sometimes copyright owners are willing to give permission (and proper license!) even if it was not.
Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!). See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. In either case, unless a statement authorizing the material under compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, permission will need to be confirmed through e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation. See Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article.
Please note that it may take a few days for letters to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged.
Rewriting content
Any contributor may rewrite articles that are or seem to be copyight problems to exclude duplicated or closely paraphrased text. When articles or sections of articles are blanked as copyright problems, rewriting is done on a temporary page at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. (The template blanking the article will link to the specific temporary page.)
Please do not copy over the version of the article that is a copyright problem as your base. All copied content, or material derived from it, should be removed first. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. It is often a good idea – and essential when the content is copied from an inaccessible source such as a book – to locate the point where the material entered the article and eliminate all text added by that contributor. This will help avoid inadvertently continuing the copyright issues in your rewrite. If you use any text at all from the earlier version of the article, please leave a note on the listing to alert the administrator or clerk who review the rewrite. The history of the old article will then have to be retained. (If the original turns out to be non-infringing, the two versions of the article can be merged.)
Rewrites can be done directly in articles that have been tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} and {{copy-paste}}, with those tags removed after the rewrite is complete.
Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the linked guidelines and policies within it if necessary to review Wikipedia's practices for handling non-free text. Reviewing Wikipedia:Plagiarism is also helpful, particularly where content is compatibly licensed or public domain. Repairing these issues can sometimes be as simple as supplying proper attribution.
Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)
If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, then stating on the article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the work (or acting as his or her agent), while not likely to prevent deletion, helps. To completely resolve copyright concerns, it is sufficient to either:
- Link to a note permitting reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation, ideally using the email template at WP:CONSENT.
See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Please note that it may take a bit of time for letters and e-mails to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged. Your e-mail will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.
One other factor you should consider, however, is that content that has been previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially the core policies that govern the project. This may help prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.
Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.
Clerks and patrolling administrators
Copyright clerks
For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.
Copyright clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia who are familiar with copyright and non-free content policies and its enforcement. They are trusted to evaluate and close listings and request administrative actions when necessary. Clerks are periodically reviewed by other clerks and patrolling administrators.
Copyright problems board administrators
For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.
Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. Working the copyright problems board may involve evaluating listings personally or using tools as necessary to complete closures by clerks. Clerks have been evaluated in their work, and their recommendations may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review recommendations and discuss them with the clerks in question.
Closing listings
Pages can be processed at any time by anyone, but are not formally closed until a clerk or administrator verifies that all problems are resolved. Pages listed for presumptive deletion stay open for a minimum of 7 days before being processed. VRT agents may close listings at any times.
For advice for resolving listings, see:
- Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for admins (VRT agents, see section there)
- Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for clerks
The templates collected at Template:CPC may be useful for administrators, clerks and VRT agents noting resolution.
Listings of possible copyright problems
Older than 7 days
6 August 2023
- Suspected copyright infringements without a source from March 2011
- 2nd Battalion 32nd Field Artillery Regiment (United States) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Merged to 32nd Field Artillery Regiment. MER-C 17:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Massive dump with no sources, probably a copyvio but I can't find a source. Will remove as unsourced. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 02:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- BMW Marine (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Botanical Research Institute of Texas (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Congregation B'nai Jacob (Woodbridge, Connecticut) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Gordon E. Hines (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Charles Andrew Howell III (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Michael Hudson (economist) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- José Limón (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Louis W. Menk (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 18:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Steve Daines (history · last edit · rewrite) (archive 1)
- Article 100% different now, considering it clean. Wizardman 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Tanycyte (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 18:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Marcos Valle (history · last edit · rewrite)
Issue resolved. Removed as unsourced. Sennecaster (Chat) 02:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Ends. MER-C 17:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Regular suspected copyright infringements
- Hayflick limit (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236227809_Three_layer_functional_model_and_energy_exchange_concept_of_aging_process - you need to view the pdf to see the copy/pasted sentence. The user inserted the sentence in this edit on 21 Sep 2021 with an edit description that doesn't match the actual edit. Could be an innocent mistake but in that case the user didn't double-check the edit. Boud (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
7 August 2023
- Draft:Timeline of violent events relating to the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1977) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Report-Lebanon-Mapping-2013-EN_0.pdf. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
17 August 2023
- Smith of Wootton Major (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.scifi.darkroastedblend.com/2005/10/j-r-r-tolkien_20.html. Frzzl talk; contribs 10:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Issue resolved. See Talk:Smith of Wootton Major/GA1 and talk pages. MER-C 17:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Raghoji I of Nagpur (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://ve65.blogspot.com/2015/02/14th-february-1755-raguji-bhosale-of.html. Content at the blog is possibly copied from the Gazetteer that the editor cited in their citations. Either way, it's copyright. — Diannaa (talk) 15:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Draft:1964 Clark Air Force Base C-135 crash (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.baaa-acro.com/flighttype/military?page=132. — Diannaa (talk)
- Mohammed Amin Adam (history · last edit· rewrite) · from https://energynewsafrica.com/index.php/2021/07/01/ghana-dr-amin-assigned-to-power-sector-agyapa-mercer-to-petroleum/, among others. Unclear if first revisions are salvageable. Vanamonde (Talk)
- Articles with close paraphrasing from April to June 2018
- Agrarian reforms in Azerbaijan (history · last edit · rewrite)
No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Wizardman 00:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Cartoons (Cupcakke song) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://massappeal.com/cupcakkes-cartoons-video
- Colla di Boasi (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Exit (Cupcakke song) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.thenation.com/article/cupcakkes-soul-searching/
- Cleve Gray (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/10/obituaries/arts/cleve-gray-86-a-painter-of-large-abstract-works.html
- Black nationalism (history · last edit · rewrite)
- John Fitzgerald Kennedy Memorial (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.jfk.org/the-assassination/history-of-john-f-kennedy-memorial-plaza/
- Shaurya (missile) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Janusz Bałdyga (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://en.prpgnd.net/artists/Janusz-Baldyga/Bio
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 01:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Modernization under Haile Selassie (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 01:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Umman Manda (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 18:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Zoological Society of Montreal (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://archivalcollections.library.mcgill.ca/index.php/zoological-society-of-montreal-fonds
Blanked and relisted under today. MER-C 08:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
End. MER-C 18:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Samut Prakan City F.C. (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://ignatblogs.wordpress.com/2018/09/13/pattaya-united-fc/. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 16:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Draft:Oatland Island Wildlife Center (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://sccpss.com/schools/oatland/Pages/History.aspx. Foundational. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. MER-C 16:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
24 August 2023
- Draft:E42.ai (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://apacentrepreneur.com/animesh-sanjeev-two-new-age-visionaries-on-the-quest-to-change-the-man-machine-interactions-of-the-future/ https://www.cxotoday.com/press-release/e42-onboards-care-by-tech-as-a-strategic-partner-in-the-uk-and-european-region/. Foundational. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Article deleted for a reason other than copyright concerns. Deleted as spam. MER-C 16:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- (T··H·L·R) Zumba - this article is being kind of a pain; I took out one section of copyvio, but it appears that (1) there is more cv in here, at least including some in the lead (check Earwig), and (2) it goes way back in the revision history. Anyway, I don't have time to deal with this right now (or figure out what the right template to use at the beginning of this is, so... I can help later if there's still work to do but if someone else wants to so I don't have to that'd be great :P. LittlePuppers (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- And some of this may be other sources copying off of WP, but I'm not sure. LittlePuppers (talk) 02:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Laura D'Oriano (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://web.archive.org/web/20120326133255/http://levantineheritage.com/d'oriano.htm. The author implies in their first edit summary that their material came from de.wiki, but this website predates the creation of the de.wiki article. — Diannaa (talk) 23:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Backwardscopy. Tag placed at talk page. it.wp article predates the blog archive. I cannot substantiate any infringement. MER-C 17:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
25 August 2023
- Area Scatter (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://steemit.com/life/@chuxlouis/the-curious-case-of-area-scatter-was-area-scatter-nigeria-s-first-ever-known-transvestite-and-celebrity-cross-dresser https://lekkiloaded.com/history-meet-area-scatter-the-first-african-popular-crossdresser-from-eastern-nigeria/ https://ng.opera.news/ng/en/entertainment/c8f1b2c6d82ac653de8eca0eeb4a02d1. Foundational. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. MER-C 09:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Chronica Hungarorum (history · last edit · rewrite) Badly paraphrased/google translated text from: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Azure94 (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- There's a consistent pattern of grammatical errors and awkward sentences that can only be explained by the text going through google translate. Example: "This is the first example, that the printing history of a country begin with the publication of the history of a people." and "The chronicle abruptly here, the Hungarian history of the last four years (1469–1473) is missing.". There's also a lot of very "flowery" and non-encyclopedic language, such as "The Thuróczy Chronicle itself is the result of historical construction carried out over several centuries, the knowledge of future generations rested on this most complete Hungarian medieval history." It's obvious that an extensive amount of the article's text was directly lifted from the sources. Azure94 (talk) 09:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Copyvio has this to say on the one English language source: [5] Almost half of it is copypasted with only slight paraphrasing. Azure94 (talk) 09:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Copyright team, I have a feedback for this report: I show a very intense personal harassment campaign against me by Azure94 who reported my edits again and he uses the "copyright tool" just for the harassment. He has very minimal own edits, his campaign to remove all my edits from Wikipedia, he also remove my added images from articles, and all other sourced reliable academic contents just because I added those. In July: Because of long debate on other talk pages, edit war by Azure94 against academic sources: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary#Agressive edit war on Hungarian topics. Often naming me "troll, bizarre, schizophrenic" [6][7][8] same profane insults with a very respected editor after following my edits:1. Then Azure94 intentionally followed me to many articles as revenge, he exclusively edited almost only those articles what I edited recently, and started exclusively harass my edits on these pages. A small settlement had a few lead sentence, I added a church and fresco history, then Azure94 deliberately removed the full chapter because of "copyright", instead of fix those minor things giving an extra job for the admins: Sopronbánfalva [9] In the reality Azure94 does not care with the copyright or with the article, he just follows me in articles what I edited as personal revenge to make continuous conflicts. Wizardman from the copyright team, slightly changed and restored the content, then Azure94 scolded the admin that he is not satisfied, he wants more removal of my content: [10] User talk:Wizardman#Sopronbánfalva In other way, Azure94 said, it is a "big copyright problem" that I translated a non English, Hungarian text "good chance" to "probably" [11], while some hours later he copy-pasted a very long English text words by words in an article where again he followed my edit: [12][13]. Which means he does not care with the copyright in his case. Here Talk:Gesta Hungarorum#Dennis Deletant, he said "Be more careful next time" because I did not copy-pasted exactly the same text to avoid copyright issue, then he copy-pasted the text word by word from the English source. 3 weeks later, in August: Azure94 did not do any edit 3 weeks long, but he suddenly appeared and exclusively started again bigger intensity to follow only my older contributions which are presented on my user pages. Azure94 has not much own edits, he started exclusively delete only my contents in many different articles as personal harrasment, and he did all this only within 1 hour! period, which clearly show his personal harrasment intentions and not the deep knowledge in many different articles. Within 1 hour period: Copyright team slightly modified and restored my content, but he removed even more content: Sopronbánfalva [14] He removed academic sourced content what I added recently: Bratislava [15] He wanted to remove all my edits: Ladislaus I of Hungary [16] He removed my personally captured photos: Anonymus (notary of Béla III) [17] He wants delete my old edits:Turul [18] He wants delete my old edits: Seven chieftains of the Magyars [19] He wants delete my old edits: Attila [20] He wants delete my old edits: Albert Wass [21] I created this article earlier, the topic is about an old illustrated book, a series of king portraits, illustrations are the essence which are used in many medieval articles, all relevant and have descriptions, he removed all of them (c.15,000 characters): Nádasdy Mausoleum [22] I wrote the full reported article with a lot of effort to create a great article (my version), the topic is about an old medieval famous illustrated book, illustrations are the essence which are used in many medieval articles, all relevant, they are listed separate and have a long descriptions (as many articles has a list), first Azure94 removed all of them (c.48,000 characters), this is cleary a vandalism: Chronica Hungarorum [23] Some minutes later he removed completely the full article (even no word remains) based on allegedly copyright only because I wrote it many months ago: [24] As we can see, he has a great obsession to critize my every single edits to perish them, even Azure94 checked my content with a tool he emphasized here 1 My academic source is a desrciption from an open Hungarian state library about a medieval book, however my article is quite complex and different not a copy pasted contents word by words as Azure did in his edits as I presented above. That tool show matches like: "At the end of the", "history of the Hungarians", "medieval Hungarian chronicles", "The Augsburg edition had two versions". I do not know how should I write different these things, should we add copyright protection to every single English words because everybody else using them? These basic essential matches is the nature of the topic. It is clear this is a deliberate teasing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrionNimrod (talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC) |
28 August 2023
- Vasily Arkhipov (history · last edit · rewrite) The entire section Talk:Vasily Arkhipov#Parlamentskaya Gazeta, May 17, 2002 -new machine translation consists of a single post that is a copy-paste of a machine translation of a [modern, copyrighted] newspaper article. A URL for the original was not provided, just a statement that that's what it is. While it's not a copy-paste directly from the original website, it's obviously a derivative work. Diff of the post: [25]. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 10:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wind power in India (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://mgired.karnataka.gov.in/page/Departments/Department+of+Small+Wind+and+Pico+Hydro+Energy/en. 103.241.226.169 (talk) 06:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Dhayan Singh (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://books.google.co.in/books?newbks=0&redir_esc=y&id=Y40MAAAAYAAJ&dq=gaur+brahmin+army&pg=RA3-PA11&sig=ACfU3U3opQRfNWfmpdC29i65dFwafKr4iQ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22in+that+capacity+he+strived%22. Was tagged as WP:G12, but I can't establish copyright status of the book – not in WorldCat, apparently not by Samuel Smiles (who died in 1904), snippet view only on Google – so listing here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- OCLC 26197481 is the WorldCat number, but this is one of those "Who's Who"s so I'm unsure as to whether it should be anon or whether the editor is the copyright holder. – Isochrone (T) 18:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
4 September 2023
- Suspected copyright infringements without a source from April 2011
- Hong Kong Amateur Hockey Club (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Marilyn Horowitz (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Vashtie Kola (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Oseen's approximation (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Gurdial Singh Phul (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Tadao Umesao (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Articles with close paraphrasing from July 2018
- Joice Hasselmann (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Jenny Lin (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Soaring Eagles Dance Group (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Articles with improper non-free content from March 2018
- Anthems in Animal Farm (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Gilmore College for Girls (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 02:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Egevadluq Ragee (history · last edit · rewrite)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 02:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
End. MER-C 18:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
19 September 2023
- Laspur (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://chitraltoday.net/2017/09/17/laspur-valley-the-land-of-giants/?amp=1. user:A smart kittenmeow 13:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- List of The Best Show with Tom Scharpling episodes (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://wfmu.org/playlists/BS. Episode descriptions are taken largely verbatim from this website, as well as the all-caps episode titles further down the page although those might be acceptable. IMO copyvio could be cleaned, but copyvios are present in history going back to 2015 and so I'm not sure how to approach this. I did not notify the creator since they have not edited since 2017. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am a producer for the show and can help clear anything up.
- The all-caps episode titles are the exact titles--evidenced here on the RSS feed: https://www.google.com/search?q=best+show+with+tom+scharpling&oq=best+show+with+tom+&aqs=chrome.0.0i512j69i57j0i22i30l3j69i60l3.3301j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
- Episode descriptions from the 2000s' shows are from years ago but they can be rewritten or removed altogether as the titles of the episodes mainly explain the show content. BrettdavisFD (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- List of The Best Show with Tom Scharpling episodes (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://wfmu.org/playlists/BS. BrettdavisFD (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
New listings
New listings are not added directly to this page but are instead on daily reports. To add a new listing, please go to . Instructions for adding new listings can be found at Instructions for listing text-based copyright concerns. Editors may resolve issues within listings by removing the copyrighted content or rewriting content on the temporary pages at any time, save for presumptive deletion. See the section on responding for more information.
22 September 2023
- Crimean campaign (1646) (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.reenactor.ru/ARH/PDF/Davies.pdf. See https://copypatrol.toolforge.org/en/?id=102395218 — Diannaa (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
23 September 2023
- Draft:Wildcard Theatre Company (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.wildcardtheatre.co.uk/about https://www.wildcardtheatre.co.uk/. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. Deleted by Wizardman. MER-C 18:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
25 September 2023
- Jonathan Freeman-Attwood (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.ram.ac.uk/people/jonathan-freeman-attwood. Older revisions were copied form https://web.archive.org/web/20101203023310/http://www.ram.ac.uk/find-people?pid=448 — Diannaa (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
26 September 2023
- Dorstone cheese (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Chamaemelum. At least some text is copied from https://www.cheese.com/dorstone/ — SamX [talk · contribs] 15:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- F106 highway (Nigeria) (history · last edit · rewrite) from [26]. Part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Chamaemelum. Listing here because it's close paraphrasing, so I'm not sure if it qualifies for G12. — SamX [talk · contribs] 15:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- F108 highway (Nigeria) (history · last edit · rewrite) from [27]. Part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Chamaemelum. Listing here because it's close paraphrasing, so I'm not sure if it qualifies for G12. — SamX [talk · contribs] 15:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- F101 highway (Nigeria) (history · last edit · rewrite) from [28]. Part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Chamaemelum. Listing here because it's close paraphrasing, so I'm not sure if it qualifies for G12. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- F107 highway (Nigeria) (history · last edit · rewrite) from [29]. Part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Chamaemelum. Listing here because it's close paraphrasing, so I'm not sure if it qualifies for G12. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- F104 highway (Nigeria) (history · last edit · rewrite) from [30]. Part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Chamaemelum. Listing here because it's close paraphrasing, so I'm not sure if it qualifies for G12. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Butterscotch Tart (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Chamaemelum. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia's current date is 29 September 2023. Put new article listings in . Files should be handled by speedy deletion or Wikipedia:Files for discussion.