This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
FYI EWN posting
I presume you have seen my ping. New posting on EWN: wp:EWN#User:Smefs reported by User:Adakiko (Result: ) Cheers Adakiko (talk) 13:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but I saw this message first. Am I supposed to do anything now? If not, I don't know why I get alerts and notices all over the place. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- You don't need to do anything. My apology for the excessive notifications. If you have time, a quick check of my hack-job of an EWN posting would be appreciated! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 13:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- NP. Looks good. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- You don't need to do anything. My apology for the excessive notifications. If you have time, a quick check of my hack-job of an EWN posting would be appreciated! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 13:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Project Veritas
You restored a forum style post. Doug Weller talk 19:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Was your restoration of a trolls edit a mistake? O3000, Ret. (talk) 19:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought I was reverting the addition, not the removal. Don't know how this happened. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Happens O3000, Ret. (talk) 19:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Re: Why They Deny Bigfoot
MOUNTAIN of excellent scientific data and evidence demonstrating the existence of the species. Your glaring ignorance of that ("crap" for evidence) IS YOUR OWN. If you'd care to have your glaring ignorance exposed and be exposed to the SCIENTIFIC REALITY of the existence of a highly elusive ice age Great Ape currently inhabiting North America, feel free to drop me a line. Curious to find out what you label as "pseudoscince". I hope youre referring to the absurdly ridiculous concept that CO2 drives climat change. Dr. Mike Johnson 200.88.175.94 (talk) 07:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, another excellent example of what I wrote here: [1]
"You do not know enough to judge this" is a common pro-pseudoscience talking point, also used by astrologers and homeopaths.
I would add Bigfooties to the list in the future, but you are only one data point. - I do not know how you got here or why you are talking about Bigfoot and climate change, because you failed to give a link to it.
- And no, I will not try to educate you in private. I deleted your address because publishing it on the internet is always a bad idea. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Expect disruption
Musk. Though all relevant pages are probably semi-ed. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- I guess this is about something that happened in that thread but is now way down. --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, got it. "prosecute Fauci", at the top. (Twitter was never my medium.) That Eon Musp guy seems to be have quite a fanboi following. --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- There are h8ers too though. -Roxy the dog 16:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not for long. He is an absolutist after all, freeze-peach and otherwise. --Hob Gadling (talk) 16:08, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- There are h8ers too though. -Roxy the dog 16:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, got it. "prosecute Fauci", at the top. (Twitter was never my medium.) That Eon Musp guy seems to be have quite a fanboi following. --Hob Gadling (talk) 15:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I asked at FTN about that article being used in Pyramid power
Doug Weller talk 13:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have seen it. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Padre Pio
Hi, we collaborated well the other day on the Miracle of Lanciano article. It was about massive influence and distortion of content by religious POV. I would like to bring to your attention a slanted discussion: I reported a religious user and the editors see it as a violation of Wikipedia rules on my page. Maybe you can participate in the relevant discussion. Greetings