• About Good Acts
  • Veterans Resources
  • From Pharms to Farms | A Veteran’s Road to Freedom
  • Petition to Educate the DEA on the Medical Benefits of Cannabis
Good Acts

The best road to progress is freedom's road. - JFK

Texas

 Archives
  1. WP:UW Archives 1
  2. WP:UW Archives 2
  3. WP:UW Archives 3
  4. WP:UW Archives 4
  5. WP:UW Archives 5
  • WP:UW merged into WP:UTM
WP:UTM archives
  1. April 2005–April 2006
  2. April 2006–October 2006
  3. October 2006–January 2007
  4. January 2007–February 2007
  5. February 2007
  6. February 2007–March 2007
  7. March 2007–September 2007
  8. September 2007–May 2008
  9. April 2008–June 2009
  10. June 2009–May 2010
  11. May 2010–February 2011
  12. February 2011–September 2013
  13. October 2013–July 2015
  14. July 2015–December 2016
  15. December 2016–August 2018
  16. August 2018–February 2020
  17. February 2020–November 2020
  18. December 2020–present
  19. /Archive 19

Contents

  • 1 Template:Uw-upv
  • 2 Requesting to create Uw-draftintalk
  • 3 Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2022
  • 4 uw-talkin...
  • 5 Template:uw-spamublock with notalk parameter
  • 6 Template-protected edit request on 24 May 2022
  • 7 Template:Templates notice

Template:Uw-upv

Could you change the image to: Information orange.svg, in case it is the first time a user has been warned with the template? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 03:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, is this a notice or a warning? casualdejekyll 21:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And yes, I'm aware it's categorized as a warning. But should it be a notice, or a warning? That's the question I should have asked oops casualdejekyll 21:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Casualdejekyll: Someone may have done what the warning tells not to do for the first time. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 17:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to create Uw-draftintalk

Within the last 15 days, I came across two cases wherein the user has used their talk page to create drafts, one was a G11 (unambiguous self-promotion) candidate, and thus deleted with a deletion notice. But today, I see a (probably) genuine effort to create a draft article. There should be a template, that tells the user that user talk pages are only for communication, and that drafts are created in draft namespace or as subpage of the User page. There should also be a link to the destination page, where the draft has been moved to. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • C • L) 11:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hard cases make bad law". For these two cases of misuse and abuse, I can think of many more where editors are positively invited to put on the article talk page a draft of some text that they believe needs to be added or replaced in the article. This is often part of a BRD discussion and so is a Good Thing. So, in your second case, it would be less effort all round for you to write a friendly note to the editor to tell them about their sandbox. Uw- templates are for the "here we go again, not another one" cases where you can't bear to write that friendly note yet again. Let's not clog the list of uw templates with such 'rarely used' cases. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:48, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just post a personal note directing them to their sandbox, (with link) and then on to AfC (with link) when they think their article is ready? Between those two, and perhaps links to the help desk and teahouse, that should be more than sufficient guidance. (imho) - wolf 16:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(oop. Just noticed JMF suggested basically the same thing above, just after I posted. - wolf 16:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2022

Please add Template:uw-pablock, Template:uw-adminublock, Template:uw-adminuhblock, Template:uw-botuhblock and Template:uw-ublock-nonsense to the table at Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace.

Consider creating Template:uw-uhblock-nonsense as well. 67.21.154.193 (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done See diff. jcgoble3 (talk) 00:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

uw-talkin...

There's {{uw-talkinarticle}}/1/2/3 ... is there the equivalent for other namespaces where discussions do not occur on the subjectpage? (ie. filespace, categoryspace, portalspace, modulespace, mediawikispace, most of templatespace) ... discussions seem to occur on subjectpages only in WPspace and DRAFTspace, and templatespace holding pages for nominations (not regular templates). -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I personally see no reason why there shouldn't be a more generalized {{uw-talkinpage}} series... hmm casualdejekyll 21:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? In what conceivable circumstances would it be appropriate to direct a template warning at an editor familiar enough with the project to be doing anything in those spaces? Please give yourselves a UW-timewasting warning. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:uw-spamublock with notalk parameter

I noticed that this when the notalk parameter of this template is switched on, much of the instructions about the policy are missing, including the three bullet points. Should we do something about it? 67.21.154.193 (talk) 12:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 24 May 2022

Change "Your addition to edit your talk page" to "In addition, your addition to edit your talk page" in templates Template:uw-uhblock-double, Template:uw-compblock, Template:uw-aeblock and Template:uw-spamublock.

Also, any comment about the spamublock issue in the section above? 67.21.154.193 (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done that phrase does not appear on this template. Please view the source text. — xaosflux Talk 14:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the text under the notalk parameter. "Your addition to edit your talk page has also been revoked" to "In addition, your addition to edit your talk page has also been revoked" 67.21.154.193 (talk) 15:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
trout Self-trout i meant "your ability to edit your talk page" 67.21.154.193 (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux: check again for "Your addition to edit your talk page has also been revoked". Also, any comment about this? 67.21.154.193 (talk) 15:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Those still seem to be missing, please create and update the appropriate sandboxes, when done link to the updated sandboxes and reactivate the edit request. — xaosflux Talk 16:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the sandboxes have already been edited, and I know I'll screw something up if I try to revert it 67.21.154.193 (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: carry this change over to Template:uw-uhblock-double, Template:uw-compblock, Template:uw-aeblock, Template:SockBlock and Template:uw-spamublock. (text is only visible when notalk parameter is set) 67.21.154.193 (talk) 12:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: The "also" later in that sentence clarifies that this is a different action, it is probably best to be concise with these templates and you should gather consensus for this change as it doesn't add anything substantive and just extends the length of the text. Terasail[✉️] 12:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Templates notice

I tried changing the "max" parameter in this template at Template:Uw-islamhon1 to "1", but that seems to display an unintended "{{1}}" in the "level 2" field. Could anyone help? 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace
  • This page was last edited on 25 May 2022, at 20:52 (UTC).
  • Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
  • Privacy policy
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
  • Contact Wikipedia
  • Mobile view
  • Developers
  • Statistics
  • Cookie statement
  • Wikimedia Foundation
  • Powered by MediaWiki

Please consider signing this Petition to Educate the DEA and UN on the medical benefits of Cannabis.

State Resources

  • Texas

    Texas

    January 22, 2018
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | rTMS | Depression Therapy for Veterans at the Waco, Tx. VA

    Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | rTMS | Depression Therapy for Veterans at the Waco, Tx. VA

    February 22, 2019
  • San Diego Vet Centers

    San Diego Vet Centers

    January 22, 2018

Resources

  • VA Administration Sets National Policy Allowing Robotic Prosthetics

    VA Administration Sets National Policy Allowing Robotic Prosthetics

    December 26, 2015
  • VA benefits for Veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States of America

    VA benefits for Veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States of America

    March 18, 2016
  • Human Tissue Regeneration with Pigs Bladder Powder

    Human Tissue Regeneration with Pigs Bladder Powder

    March 18, 2016

Latest Posts

  • The American Legion Urge the Drug Enforcement Agency to License Privately-Funded Medical Marijuana Production Operations in the United States

    The American Legion Urge the Drug Enforcement Agency to License Privately-Funded Medical Marijuana Production Operations in the United States

    September 11, 2016
  • Compassionate Care Act of 2015 in Texas Discriminates Against Veterans

    Compassionate Care Act of 2015 in Texas Discriminates Against Veterans

    March 27, 2016
  • National Second Opinion Day 4/20/16 - All Veterans Ask VA for Second Opinion

    National Second Opinion Day 4/20/16 – All Veterans Ask VA for Second Opinion

    March 18, 2019

FOIA Contacts

  • Veterans Affairs | Veteran Claims File Request

  • Postal Inspection Service

  • USPS Field Office

Copyright © 2022 Good Acts.

Omega WordPress Theme by ThemeHall