2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
The copyvio was added back again, for the fourth time, by the same account 2 minutes after you did the revdel, I'm afraid. 2A00:23C5:50E8:EE01:79FB:BC74:BEDF:FF0C (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked and RevDel'd again. Thanks for letting me know. — JJMC89 19:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Appeal of partial block
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 23:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @JJMC89:, I recently posted to Administrators Noticeboard- Incidents but I think that's the wrong place. I'd like to discuss the partial block imposed upon me.
I understand Wikipedia is a serious project and I am not here to toy around or disrupt the encyclopedia. I am here to contribute in good faith. I want to contribute effectively and help Wikipedia become a stronger source of information.
I ask that you lift this partial block placed on my account. I acknowledge that I have made mistakes with CopyPatrol and will not repeat them again. I am very willing to learn from the mistakes, and go through further material prior to using it again.
I feel that it would have been better if I were warned prior to being blocked. I was not aware that I was using the tool incorrectly. It was never my intention to make incorrect reviews and for that I apologize. WizardGamer775 (talk) 00:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Contributing in good faith is not enough. Non-admins working on copyright cleanup need to be trusted by the administrators who volunteer in copyright cleanup in their knowledge and judgment, and the administrators should not feel that they must continually check over their work. Your high error rate and you not taking appropriate cleanup actions, shows that your judgement/knowledge cannot be trusted. Your reviews would need to be continually checked. We don't have time to do that – doing our own reviews of copyright problems is time consuming enough. — JJMC89 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I am leaving Wikipedia permanently. I thought I'd give it a second chance. A website which punishes those who help in good faith is not a place where I would want to be. WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @WizardGamer775: I understand your frustration but new editors should definitely not start with copyright cleanup. Because of its legal nature there's little room for error, even when assuming good faith. WP:CIR is especially relevant. If you really want to get into copyright cleanup, review our policies (WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:REVDEL, WP:OVERQUOTE to name a few) thoroughly, maybe do some CCI for a bit, but the most important part is quality over quantity. We are going for speed, not accuracy. Copyright review is extremely tedious and definitely not for everyone. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 18:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @WizardGamer775: I understand your frustration but new editors should definitely not start with copyright cleanup. Because of its legal nature there's little room for error, even when assuming good faith. WP:CIR is especially relevant. If you really want to get into copyright cleanup, review our policies (WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:REVDEL, WP:OVERQUOTE to name a few) thoroughly, maybe do some CCI for a bit, but the most important part is quality over quantity. We are going for speed, not accuracy. Copyright review is extremely tedious and definitely not for everyone. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
- I am leaving Wikipedia permanently. I thought I'd give it a second chance. A website which punishes those who help in good faith is not a place where I would want to be. WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Food and drink in England category talk page
The Category:Food and drink in England talk page needs fixing as I accidentally moved it trying to move the main category article. Please could you assist as I have tried to fix it but it hasn’t fixed the talk page. ChefBear01 (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- This looks to already be resolved. — JJMC89 17:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
@JJMC89: Somehow the two talk pages have been minced I need you to delete the Draft Wiki Project Food and drink industry of England talk page, this should hopefully untangle them.- I would like to invite you to join the above Draft:WikiProject food and drink industry in England, Many thanks. ChefBear01 (talk) ChefBear01 (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
CFD bot requests
Hi JJMC89, please could JJMC89 bot III also process category renamings within the following templates:
- The category parameter within {{Stub category}} e.g. [1]
- The usercategory parameter within {{userbox}} e.g. [2]
There will always be manual follow up required for some CFDs, but these seem fair requests for a bot to handle. Thanks in advance for you consideration! – Fayenatic London 11:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Portal:Politics/News/Wikinews needs updates
The page has been stuck on news from 2021 for whatever reason. wikinews:Portal:Politics and conflicts/Wikipedia which the link at the bottom refers to as the source of retrievals is non-existent. That portal on Wikinews has been merged and redirected to wikinews:Category:Politics and conflicts. Latest political news can be retrieved on Wikinews through wikinews:Template:Topic header with parameter the {{Topic header|Politics and conflicts}}. Could this be fixed so the bot updates this Portal:Politics section again? Cheers. –Vipz (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Draft moved from Mainspace still apply?
Hi @JJMC89, I hope you're doing well.
Im currently submitting the draft for Hirohara Shrine, a random user by the name user:WC gudang inspirasi made an unauthorized moved the article from Draftspace to Mainspace without the actual anf necessary review process nor the adequate role for it (see: WP:AFCREVIEW.) Thus from here I revert it back to Draftspace. I then notice your bot adding {{drafts moved from mainspace}}
. Well indeed it was, but does it still count? even if it was unauthorized? Cheers. Kaliper1 (talk) 07:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)