{{archive box
Page Imformation
How to go to Page Imformation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.8.184.67 (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- You should ask these questions in WP:Teahouse but any way, if you have asked so here's the answer, if you are in the laptop, open the page you want to see the imformation of, then in the left side bar, in the tools section, you will see the link Page Information. Click on it and done! If you are in moblie write this Information for "Example Article Page". and then you will enter the Page Information of you selcted page. (eg-Information for "Doraemon: Nobita's Little Star Wars 2021")--DeepGlow2009 (talk • contribs)--
File:Griffith Wildfire.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Griffith Wildfire.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —teb728 t c 06:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC) —teb728 t c 06:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doraemon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Doraemon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision diffs
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok i will write the edit summary after evry edit i make.DeepGlow2009 (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)DeepGlow2009 (talk • contribs)
The article Doraemon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Doraemon for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
The article Zaca Fire you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zaca Fire for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Crackòvia
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Crackòvia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Northern Escapee (talk) 11:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Griffith Wildfire.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Griffith Wildfire.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.kqed.org/news/11848464/dont-call-it-a-curfew-californias-new-less-restrictive-stay-at-home-order-still-draws-backlash. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:1980 Ash Wednesday bushfires.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:1980 Ash Wednesday bushfires.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.abc.net.au/news/emergency/2013-02-14/ash-wednesday-bushfires-1983-from-the-archives/4519214?nw=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:1974–75 Australian bushfire season.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:1974–75 Australian bushfire season.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.science.org.au/news-and-events/news-and-media-releases/australian-bushfires-why-they-are-unprecedented. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Copying images from the Internet
You cannot upload images you find on the internet unless they have been made available under a free license acceptable to Wikipedia. Most images you find on the Internet are copyrighted. Continued upload of such images is a copyright violation and will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 12:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Your recent GA nominations
DeepGlow2009, I would like to strongly suggest that you wait until you gain a great deal more experience editing Wikipedia in general and articles in particular before you make any further GA nominations or do anything further in the GA space. Unfortunately, I have had to revert both of your nominations, as they were out-of-process.
First, if you aren't a significant contributor to the articles involved—both Zaca Fire and Doraemon. You are supposed to consult with those who are before you nominate per WP:GANI: Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.
Next, you can't review your own nomination (as you initially tried with Zaca Fire), and you can't set a review status as you did with Doraemon, trying to make it "onhold".
Even more troubling, Zaca Fire is a tiny article with obvious and significant issues (there's a citation needed template), and currently rated "Start-class", about as far as you can get from GA quality. If you truly thought this should be nominated to be a good article, your understanding of the GA criteria is seriously lacking.
There's a lot to do around Wikipedia that doesn't involve good articles; I'm sure you'll find something rewarding to do. Best of luck finding enjoyment here. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi DeepGlow2009! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi DeepGlow2009! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi DeepGlow2009! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|